According To Science by James Arjuna

According to science:

Modern humans arrived some 200,000 years ago.
We can see from the oldest human "fossils we have" that our bone structure and our skull was better shaped.  Our skull in the "Herto Fossil" (160,000 years ago) was larger than your average human today and had a more rounded appearance (The more rounded appearance can be from the female birth canal being larger and better made for passing the human skull as well, similar to what we see in caesarian births today.)
Modern female Anglos have decreasing size of the hips and this means less space for the human head at birth.  This is some sort of ideal of female perfection of modern ignorant ("sophisticated") humans. (To make boys out of women.)  Skinny hips with no belly is considered idea by "fashion" people.  This may have something to do with birth trauma and compression of brain tissue at birth.  Thick hips and distended, uterine belly "bump" belly is far better for reproduction.  Women today are not made to be attractive as women, but as skinny boy like figures in fashion (which is the domain of gay men.)
The Orrorin is a good example of stronger bone structures. The knee joint is far better than I modern humans and the thickness of the hip to hip socket is better as well.  It is stated to be 6.1 million years old.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orrorin
When the Orrorin was found the mass of Evotards tried to get the finding destroyed.  I read the articles and the discredit tactics used, because it pretty much destroyed the lives of many of the believers.  This is an UPRIGHT WALKING superior bone structure and teeth human ancestor that predates the dumbass "Lucy".   (Lucy is a frigging chimpanzee lineage that went extinct early.)

All of the modern evidence we have from DNA studies and the physical vestiges and atavism only shows genetic degradation leading to extinction, just as it has always shown.

People are much more retarded today:

There is ONLY degeneration shown in ALL HUMAN studies of DNA.

There are 1,000,000 peer reviewed papers from all over the world clearly showing that humans are degraded, have never "evolved" and at the present rate of the rise of genetic defects our species will be reduced to stupid short living animals with no technology, no speech, no intelligence.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gquery/?term=Human+Genetic+Diseases

There are NO beneficial mutations ever found in DNA evidence.
http://evolutionsciencenow.blogspot.com/2013/06/evolutions-beneficial-mutations.html

Try this search term and see if you can find any beneficial mutations.  I have spent thousands of hours on that and so far not one beneficial mutation has ever been shown to exist. This search of all the databases in the world comes up with over 1,000,000 articles and NO beneficial mutations.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=Human+Mutations

In all these peer Science studies we find some estimated 20,000 pseudo genes. Pseudo genes are genes that used to code for human cells.  Now they are dead and fading away. Some of them are barely perceivable because of this fading of this coding.   They have completely mapped and studied 14000 of them so far.
http://www.pseudogene.org/human/index.php


http://genomebiology.com/2012/13/9/R51

According to this study we have lost close to 45% of our coding that made us much stronger and much more healthy, fit and much more intelligent.

For those who do not understand math:
  Original number of coding genes approximately 45,000;  Coding genes we have now approximately 25,000.  Number of pseudogenes (dead genes) no longer coding for body parts 20,000.   20,000 + 25,000 = 45,000 original genes.
45,000 x 45% = 20250 lost genes.  Actual precise number is 20,000/45,000 = .444444  or 44.4%.

Dr. Gerald Crabtree a renowned geneticists and professor of genetics at Stanford University states that
"I would wager that if an average citizen from Athens of 1000 BC were to appear suddenly among us, he or she would be among the brightest and most intellectually alive of our colleagues and companions, with a good memory, a broad range of ideas, and a clear-sighted view of important issues. Furthermore, I would guess that he or she would be among the most emotionally stable of our friends and colleagues. I would also make this wager for the ancient inhabitants of Africa, Asia, India or the Americas, of perhaps 2000-6000 years ago. The basis for my wager comes from new developments in genetics, anthropology, and neurobiology that make a clear prediction that our intellectual and emotional abilities are genetically surprisingly fragile."
http://rt.com/usa/intelligence-stanford-years-fragile-531/

http://naturalsociety.com/leading-geneticist-human-intelligence-slowly-declining/