There is no evidence for evolution. And you can’t falsify a magical story. So this ridiculous idea that simple life “evolved” into complexity is beyond ignorance.
You cannot falsify a myth. “Long, long ago, in the distant land of the Evotard Fairy, where science operated totally in opposition to what we find today, the Evotard Fairy sprinkled some magic dust on some dirt and amino acids were magically created. Then by some magical processes and mystical causes marine life came into existence over some magical time frame. And for no reason and for no causes, no intelligence involved at all, we just can’t have that in this story of nothing that creates something.
Then over a VERY long magical period of time, the Evotard Fairy, caused this fish, for no reason and for no cause, decided to grow legs and lungs and get out of the water and this is our oldest ancestor of humans.
There’s more but that should be enough for any sane person to trash this idea of “evolution”.”If you believe any of that I pity you.
All and I MEAN ALL of the evidence finds that humans and all animals are degraded and going extinct. There is no other type of evidence found.
And only very low intelligent people are incapable of complex thinking. So they cannot “see” Jehovah God’s SIGNATURE in all of life and how integrated all life is.
This idea of eliminating God is a corporate policy, where these corporations pay huge amounts of money to have immoral people working for them who have absolutely no concerns about other people, and for sure no concerns about their customers.
I mean what huge corporation has more concern for customers than for their money/profits? Corporations are not human they are money machines.
There is no evolution found in any physical evidence. It is just a faith based idea. And most people who believe in this magical stuff, have never just looked at the evidence.
There is only genetic degradation found in the 40,000,000 DNA studies so far. And humans are extremely degraded and sickly compared to our ancestors.
You probably don’t understand what HOX genes are and what the immune system is supposed to do with incorrectly coded cells? Maybe those “educated” really don’t understand this? It is how it is from molecular biology and the study of the human genome. This is common knowledge in biology.This is something that every MD knows about; every molecular biologist knows about:
The HOX genes are a huge number of DNA base pairs that do not produce genes but rather they direct where these cells that are created by the DNA/RNA replication process are placed in the Body.
They direct the zygote’s cells into the correct location. It is the map of the human body and how it is constructed. When a cell is first made, in the womb for heart, lung, eyes, etc the HOX system of genes directs the “tissue placement”. It is an amazingly extremely complex DESIGNED system.
Any mutation MUST integrate with that originally designed system, in the HOX system of genes. If not it causes diseases.
This is why the evolutionists idea of a “duplication” mutation as the “engine of evolution” is completely debunked. Every duplication of a protein is found. today, in some horrible diseases and has NO place in the genome where it can even function. So it makes for horrible diseases that can kill, maim; cause people to not be able to breath correctly. It is found in Autism also. I looked up every duplication mutation I could stand to look at, because after a while it starts to affect my brain with all that suffering caused by the “engine of evolution”.
And when a cell is not made correctly to the original programmed design of that cell, it is to be fixed by an enzyme process or it is to be destroyed by the immune system for being defective. This is why there is so many autoimmune diseases today.
The cells are not made correctly and so the immune system attacks them, even if they are the only cells you have. People suffer immensely from this. Our bodies were never designed to be this sick, and our cells were not designed to be mutated so badly.
We were never designed to even grow old and die. Our cell replication was to just keep on going. Now the fact that we know from evidence that we are vastly degraded from the Human Genome Project and other DNA studies, and we know that the HOX system is the ORIGINAL design of the human body, and the IMMUNE SYSTEM is looking for that original correct coding so it can correct and keep us healthy, but instead it attacks most of our cells in our bodies, then WE KNOW WE WERE EXTREMELY BETTER MADE to a level of perfection and this is OBVIOUS from the evidence.
Can you show me any evidence at all in your comments?
Please! If you believe in something and you have never studied the evidence then that does not make one into a scientist.When I took classes and asked many believers in this evolution religion for evidence, all they had was religious slogans about some “natural selection” and then I asked them to show me even one experiment where they can prove it exists that has ever been performed by any scientist?
Guess what? There NEVER has been even one study one experiment to show that positive natural selection is even plausible. It is only “believed to have happened.”
And all attempts have been failures to show this. The creature wound up as a mutant or it degraded into extinction (Lenski experiment). It is just a belief system handed to students who are eager to “believe” in this religious idea. They absorb the aphorisms (religious slogans) and believe because they think their teachers are telling the truth. And these teachers were taught the same way with aphorisms and no evidence of “natural positive selection”. Do you know this?
In every Jerry Coyne lecture (or any “evolutionist), he only shows genetic degradation as “evidence” for evolution. It is obvious to anyone with intelligence and just looks at the evidence.
In the 41,000 studies, peer journals (I studied), and papers on human development; studied for evidence showing what is really going on: genetics, and cell replication from peer evidence. All we see is extreme degradation in humans and no indication whatsoever of any increased health, increased fitness, increased new genes with new functions.
We have lost over 40% of our once coding genes. And we have some 18,000, and more, known genetic diseases. Now, 1 in 9 babies are born with, horrible, serious genetic diseases.
Evolution: The idea that any creature has gained in genetic feature, better health, more complexity is utter nonsense. There is no evidence for it. It has been debunked for over 40 years. The only reason it still is around is because humans are more emotional and, cannot deal with reality.
Being born into a system in this world diseases, suffering and death, and being told this is normal is why these things which should NEVER be accepted by any loving human are considered to be “normal”. Is it normal for a child to be born with a horrible disease that kills the and causes mothers to wail and suffer as their little baby girl or boy suffers and dies? That is NOT normal.
Syllogistic fallacies:
Also called circular logic. Where one assumes one thing to be true (with no evidence) that others believe, and one builds other assumptions on top of assumptions.
Sometimes this goes to four or five assumptions on top of assumptions .On of the most common is the radiometric dating system used to date “old things”.
1/ The assumption is that radiometric isotopes decay at a constant rate “forever” and that the rate of decay never changes. That has never been shown to be true or not. Since everything in the universe is changing, why is that not changing?.
2/ That somehow this method is accurate, when there is no way to prove it’s accuracy. It is assumed to be an accurate way to measure ‘old things’. There is no way to test it by going back in a time machine and see it is correct. We can’t do that.
3/ When dating fossils they date the dirt the animal died in. And that is supposed to be the “time of death”. The earth could be millions (and is millions of years since the radiometric materials ‘reset”) of years older than the actual animal. And as is the policy with this “science” of fossil dating if the measured date doesn’t “look right” or fit with the belief then they go and find dirt nearby that fits better with the belief system.
4/ Then by this same idea they make the strata of the earth’s layers are dated this way also, and so they use the strata which was falsely assumed to be correct by the other three assumptions above. So, they use the strata or “in situ” in the layers (that were dated by the same wrong assumptions) to “verify” (yea right?) the radiometric dating of the dirt. They think one verifies the other.
You can’t be more illogical in this fallacious way of dating “old things”.
There is no tissue in replacement fossils or imprint fossils, no carbon dating can be done, and no guess by condition. There is nothing to date in these fossils because the original organic matter is completely replaced with the minerals around the dead creature. So they use this assumption, on top of assumption, on top of assumption, on top of assumption to date fossils, which are now just rocks.
This “fancy” radiometric dating system is just crap fake science with no evidence to back it is even close to plausible for dating fossils.
This list is pretty accurate;List of fallacieshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
The only “thing” we can actually trust is modern evidence we find now in genetics and DNA on this subject. Also we find that the fossil record concurs with this degradation.
***Einstein said, 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.***
I have asked many hundreds of believers in "evolution"; this idea that fish evolved into humans, to show me even ONE beneficial mutation that could show this is possible. Without a (genetics) molecular bases for evolution then it is fraud.
So far out of all these mutations, believed to be beneficial they are part of a disease or are purely speculative and cannot be proven where they came from.
This gene for lactase is obviously a pre-existing gene that was defective in some people and working in others. The religious believers in evolution, all think that the non working version was prior to the working version, but how can that possibly be, because it is only 2 base pair difference out of 49,335 base pairs.
The most ridiculous of this is the lactose tolerance mutation. First of all making lactase enzyme is made in a gene that is 49,335 base pairs for just one of the THREE lactase genes. This is the most common of the defective one found in lactose intolerance. Which is just another type of disease which makes people sick if they drink milk or have milk products.
This is the most common gene found in lactose intolerance.
This is from the United States "genes" library
.**Where is the LCT gene located?**Cytogenetic Location: 2q21Molecular Location on chromosome 2: base pairs 135,787,844 to 135,837,179.
Base pairs are numbered by location.The math is simple:From 135,837,179 minus 135,787,844 is a total of 49,335 base pairs in this gene.
Your average gene has about 26,000 base pairs.
According to the article claiming that this was some great event creating this new gene. It turns out that it is only 2 base pairs were changed to cause this gene to function. Where did the other totally designed 49332 BP come from that were aligned perfectly and just needed two base pairs to change to make the lactose enzyme?
Do you see how ridiculous this religion is that has gotten into the classroom? It was a pre-existing gene from ancient ancestors prior to this finding and they found a group where it was turned off, LATER, and then a group where they drank milk where it was functioning.
The two base pairs were not mutated from disease in the functioning gene and in the malfunctioning gene it was and is a disease.Your entire argument {this was an answer to and Evolutionist} is that there is a "theory of evolution". The real findings in ALL the verifiable physical evidence leads a real scientist to:
***"The Theory Of Genetic Degradation Leading To Extinction"***. Or "Theory of Genetic Atrophy" Because that is ONLY what is found.
There have been found in the fossil record some 1.5 million species extinct and we now have 47000 on the list to go extinct. This includes our genetic cousins, the great apes, who are degraded to the point of 15 years max life in the wild and 25000 diseases. Humans can't go near then without giving them serious viral infections that kill them because they are so degraded. Chimp tourism is not allowed when a cold or flu in humans is taking place for this reason. In the 40+ million DNA studies there are no cases of any living or recently extinct (6000 yrs on human studies) showing even one verifiable beneficial mutation.
Note: There are no fossils of Chimpanzees. The oldest record we have is some Chimpanzee artifacts about 4000 years old. Not one of the PhD's has been able to produce one beneficial mutation. Therefore, there is no such thing as a beneficial mutation.And here is the main reason why: From the USA National Library of Medicine, showing that beneficial mutations just cannot exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment