The main argument is there is NO evidence for “evolution”.
That by some magical process and mystical causes not found in scientific evidence, creatures can ever gain in new cells, and those new cells having a new purpose.
It is ridiculous to believe such nonsense, because all we REAL scientists see is genetic degradation in every speciation event and eventual extinction. It is the LAW of GENETIC DEGRADATION LEADING TO EXTINCTION FOR ALL MULTICELLULAR CREATURES.
All of the modern evidence from molecular biology and from medical history of humans only shows a process of gene losses, and more and more genetic diseases and then extinction. We already see several examples of this in the real world with all of our “cousins” going extinct from being unable to survive even with human help.
There is no evolution found in any physical evidence. It is just a faith based idea. And most people who believe in this magical stuff, have never just looked at the evidence.
There is only genetic degradation found in the 30,000,000 DNA studies so far.
And humans are extremely degraded and sickly compared to our ancestors. Proven by recent studies in comparison of modern human DNA to our ancestors of 2000 to 6000 years ago.
You probably don’t understand what HOX genes are and what the immune system is supposed to do with incorrectly coded cells? You really don’t understand this? It is how it is from molecular biology and the study of the human genome. This is common knowledge in biology.
This is something that ever MD knows about, every molecular biologist knows about. The HOX genes are a huge number of base pairs that do not produce genes but rather they direct where these cells that are created by the DNA/RNA replication process are placed in the Body. They direct the zygote’s cells into the correct location. It is the map of the human body and how it is constructed.
When a cell is first made, in the womb for heart, lung, eyes, etc the HOX system of genes directs the “tissue placement”. It is an amazingly complex DESIGNED system.
Any mutation MUST integrate with that original design in the HOX system of genes. If not it causes diseases.
This is why the evolutionists idea of a “duplication” mutation as the “engine of evolution” is completely debunked. Every duplication of a protein is found in some horrible diseases and has NO place in the genome where it can even function. So it makes for horrible diseases that can kill, maim cause people to not be able to breath correctly. It is found in Autism also. I looked up every duplication mutation I could stand to look at, because after a while it starts to affect my brain with all that suffering caused by the “engine of evolution”.
And when a cell is not made correctly to the original programmed design of that cell, it is to be fixed by an enzyme process or it is to be destroyed by the immune system for being defective. This is by DESIGN so that we have good cells. But because of some 247,000 really bad mutations found in humans our immune system attacks our badly made cells.
This is why there is so many autoimmune diseases today. The cells are not made correctly and so the immune system attacks them, even if they are the only cells you have. People suffer immensely from this. Our bodies were never designed to be this sick, and our cells were not designed to be mutated so badly. We were never designed to even grow old and die. Our cell replication was to just keep on going.
Now the fact that we know from evidence that we are vastly degraded from the Human Genome Project and other DNA studies, and we know that the HOX system is the ORIGINAL design of the human body, and the IMMUNE SYSTEM is looking for that original correct coding so it can correct and keep us healthy, but instead it attacks most of our cells in our bodies, then WE KNOW WE WERE EXTREMELY BETTER MADE to a level of perfection and this is OBVIOUS from the evidence.
Can you show me any evidence at all in your comments? Please! If you believe in something and you have never studied the evidence then that does not make one into a scientist.
When I took classes and asked many believers in this evolution religion for evidence, all they had was religious slogans about some “natural selection” and then I asked them to show me even one experiment where they can prove it exists that has ever been performed by any scientist? Guess what?
***There NEVER has been even one study one experiment to show that positive natural selection is even plausible. It is only “believed to have happened.” ***And all attempts have been failures to show this. The creature wound up as a mutant or it degraded into extinction (Lenski experiment).It is just a belief system handed to students who are eager to “believe” in this concept.
So they absorb the aphorisms (religious slogans) and believe because they think their teachers are telling the truth. And these teachers were taught the same way with aphorisms and no evidence of “natural positive selection”. Do you know this?
In every Jerry Coyne lecture, he only shows genetic degradation as “evidence” for evolution. It is obvious to anyone with intelligence and just looks at the evidence.
In the 41,000 studies, peer journals, and papers on human development; studied for evidence showing what is really going on: genetics, and cell replication from peer evidence. All we see is extreme degradation in humans and no indication whatsoever of any increased health, increased fitness, increased new genes with new functions. We have lost over 40% of our once coding genes. And we have some (USA statistics) 18,000 known genetic diseases. Now, 1 in 9 babies are born with serious genetic diseases.
Evolution: The idea that any creature has gained in genetic feature, better health, more complexity is utter nonsense. There is no evidence for it. It has been debunked for over 40 years.
The only reason it still is around is because humans are weak and emotional and sexually compulsive: cannot deal with reality. Myths are “far better” for us in our degraded condition.
Syllogistic fallacies; Also called circular logic. Where one assumes one thing to be true that others believe, and one builds other assumptions on top of assumptions.
Sometimes this goes to four or five assumptions on top of assumptions .
On of the most common is the radiometric dating system used to date “old things”.
1/ The assumption is that radiometric isotopes decay at a constant rate “forever” and that the rate of decay never changes. That has never been shown to be true or not. Since everything in the universe is changing, why is that not changing?.
2/ That somehow this method is accurate, when there is no way to prove it’s accuracy. It is assumed to be an accurate way to measure ‘old things’. There is no way to test it by going back in a time machine and see it is correct. We can’t do that.
3/ When dating fossils they date the dirt the animal died in. And that is supposed to be the “time of death”. The earth could be millions (and is millions of years since the radiometric materials ‘reset”) of years older than the actual animal. And as is the policy with this “science” of fossil dating if the measured date doesn’t “look right” or fit with the belief then they go and find dirt near by that fits better with the belief system.
4/ Then by this same idea they make the strata of the earths layers are dated this way also, and so they use the strata which was falsely assumed to be correct by the other three assumptions above. So, they use the strata or “in situ” in the layers (that were dated by the same assumptions) to “verify” (yea right?) the radiometric dating of the dirt. They think one verifies the other. You can’t be more illogical in this fallacious way of dating “old things”.
There is no tissue in replacement fossils or imprint fossils, no carbon dating can be done, and no guess by condition. There is nothing to date in these fossils because the original organic matter is completely replaced with the minerals around the dead creature. So they use this assumption, on top of assumption, on top of assumption, on top of assumption to date fossils, which are now just rocks.
This list is pretty accurate;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallaciesThe only thing we can actually trust is modern evidence we find now in genetics and DNA on this subject, and some fossils just by appearance, and not by some extremely inaccurate dating method.***Einstein said, 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.***
I have asked many hundreds of believers in "evolution"; this idea that fish evolved into humans, to show me even ONE beneficial mutation that could show this is possible. Without a (genetics) molecular bases for evolution then it is fraud.
So far out of all the ones believed to be beneficial they are part of a disease or are purely speculative and cannot be proven where they came from. This gene for lactase is obviously a pre-existing gene that was defective in some people and working in others. The Evotards all think that the non working version was prior to the working version, but how can that possibly be, because it is only 2 base pair difference out of 49,335 base pairs.
The most ridiculous of this is the lactose tolerance mutation. First of all making lactase enzyme is made in a gene that is 49,335 base pairs for just one of the THREE lactase genes. This is the most common of the defective one found in lactose intolerance. Which is just another type of disease which makes people sick if they drink milk or have milk products.
This is the most common gene found in lactose intolerance.
This is from the United States "genes" library.
**Where is the LCT gene located?**
Cytogenetic Location: 2q21
Molecular Location on chromosome 2: base pairs 135,787,844 to 135,837,179
Base pairs are numbered by location. The math is simple:
From 135,837,179 minus 135,787,844 is a total of 49,335 base pairs in this gene.
Your average gene has about 26,000 base pairs.
According to the article claiming that this was some great event creating this new gene. It turns out that it is only 2 base pairs were changed to cause this gene to function. Where did the other totally designed 49332 BP come from that were aligned perfectly and just needed two base pairs to change to make the lactose enzyme?
Do you see how ridiculous this religion is that has gotten into the classroom?
It was a pre-existing gene from ancient ancestors prior to this finding and they found a group where it was turned off, LATER, and then a group where they drank milk where it was functioning. The two base pairs were not mutated from disease in the functioning gene and in the malfunctioning gene it was and is a disease.
Your entire argument {this was an answer to and Evolutionist} is that there is a "theory of evolution". The real findings in ALL the verifiable physical evidence leads a real scientist to ***"The Theory Of Genetic Degradation Leading To Extinction"***. Or "Theory of Genetic Atrophy" Because that is ONLY what is found.
There have been found in the fossil record some 1.5 million species extinct and we now have 47000 on the list to go extinct. This includes our genetic cousins, the great apes, who are degraded to the point of 15 years max life in the wild and 25000 diseases. Humans can't go near then without giving them serious viral infections that kill them because they are so degraded. Chimp tourism is not allowed when a cold or flu in humans is taking place for this reason.
1/Any mutation MUST integrate with that original design in the HOX system of genes. If not it causes diseases.
This is why the evolutionists idea of a “duplication” mutation as the “engine of evolution” is completely debunked. Every duplication of a protein is found in some horrible diseases and has NO place in the genome where it can even function. So it makes for horrible diseases that can kill, maim cause people to not be able to breath correctly. It is found in Autism also. I looked up every duplication mutation I could stand to look at, because after a while it starts to affect my brain with all that suffering caused by the “engine of evolution”.
2/And when a cell is not made correctly to the original programmed design of that cell, it is to be fixed by an enzyme process or it is to be destroyed by the immune system for being defective.
3/ It is impossible, not only by the facts on how our DNA functions to make cells, but that there is NO possible way for an immune system to develop on earth, when the bacteria that eats and digests human tissue proliferated the entire earth and the ocean some 40,000,000 years before the first evidence of humans.
Today we get a scratch, and because our immune system is so weak, we get a horrible flesh eating bacteria infection and must take some form of poison to kill this bacteria, called antibiotics.
Our immune system was much stronger in the past at defending us from pathogens, because we survived for thousands of years without them. It was this path of genetic degradation that created the medical industry.
https://evolutionsciencenow.blogspot.com/2013/04/are-humans-getting-better-what-is.html
